I have been involved in flight simulation for more than forty years, beginning with the earliest versions of Microsoft Flight Simulator in the 1980s. At that time, the simulator consisted of little more than simple moving lines and basic instrument indications displayed on monochrome screens, or later on very expensive early color monitors. Yet for us, at that stage, it already represented the peak of what personal computing could achieve in aviation simulation.

In those early years, I even used flight simulators as a supporting tool in training student pilots. The systems were extremely limited by today’s standards, but even then, simply observing how aircraft instruments responded on a computer screen was already considered highly valuable for understanding basic flight principles. The most advanced hardware available at that time was a joystick. When Microsoft later introduced the SideWinder Force Feedback Pro, many of us genuinely believed that flight simulation had reached a technological ceiling.

Of course, that assumption proved completely wrong.

Over the years, flight simulation continued to evolve far beyond what we had imagined. Today, with platforms such as Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 and X-Plane 12, we are dealing with an astonishing level of realism in visuals, flight dynamics, system depth, and hardware integration. At the same time, expectations from users around the world have also increased significantly.

It is in this context that I would like to share my experience with the Rowsfire A320 A107 and, in particular, the Boeing 737 overhead panel B107.

First Impressions of Rowsfire B107

As a real-world pilot, I was initially skeptical when I saw the Rowsfire Airbus A320 A107 overhead panel being offered at a price of around 350 euros. My first assumption was that this would be a simple consumer-grade product with limited practical value.

However, after using it, I was surprised by its functionality, design quality, and overall reliability.

Following that experience, I decided to order the Boeing 737 overhead panel, the B107. At around 600 euros, and with a delivery time of approximately one month due to ongoing production, I expected a similar consumer-level experience.

This expectation was again proven wrong.

The B107 turned out to be a very complete and highly functional device. The build quality is solid, and the operation is reliable without major issues. In practical use, it performs far better than what I would normally expect in this price range.

Use in PMDG 737 and Real Simulation Workflow

Both the A107 and B107 operate exceptionally well with the Fenix Airbus A320 and the PMDG Boeing 737. In my own case, I primarily use the B107 with the PMDG 737.

What impressed me most is not only the functionality itself, but the way it supports real procedural flying.

The overhead panel structure allows me to follow standard cockpit workflow in a much more natural way than mouse and keyboard interaction. During cold and dark startup procedures, system configuration, and electrical management, the physical interaction with the panel creates a continuous procedural rhythm.

More importantly, after many years away from active airline flying, I noticed that these devices helped to reactivate my own muscle memory and cockpit workflow habits. Many procedures did not need to be relearned; they were simply reactivated through physical interaction.

This effect is difficult to achieve with software alone.

Comparison Between A107 and B107

Although I am not a Boeing 737 pilot in real life, I also purchased the A320 A107, and I can say that both products share a consistent design philosophy.

The A107 is more aligned with Airbus system logic, while the B107 reflects the clearer structural separation of Boeing systems. However, both products follow the same underlying approach: they focus on procedural operation rather than simply providing switch functionality.

This is an important distinction. Many products in this category focus on appearance or basic input mapping. Rowsfire, in contrast, seems to emphasize workflow structure and operational logic.

Both units integrate well with high-end simulation software, particularly Fenix A320 and PMDG 737, without major compatibility issues in my experience.

Overall Impression of Rowsfire

From my perspective as a long-time flight simulation user and instructor, I would describe Rowsfire as a brand that focuses on structured cockpit simulation rather than purely decorative hardware.

The B107 is not an aviation-certified training device, and it does not attempt to position itself as such. However, within the scope of home simulation and procedural practice, it occupies a very meaningful middle ground.

It provides a physical structure that allows cockpit procedures to be executed in a realistic sequence, which is something that software alone cannot fully replicate.

Conclusion

Flight simulation has evolved from simple visual representation in the 1980s to highly complex system simulation today. Software has reached a remarkable level of realism, but hardware has often lagged behind.

In this context, the Rowsfire B107 stands out not because it replaces real cockpit equipment, but because it restores a sense of procedural interaction within a home simulation environment.

For me personally, it is not simply an accessory. It is a tool that reconnects procedural memory with physical interaction.

And that, in modern flight simulation, is already a significant achievement.

For more product details, please visit the B107 product page: here
If you place an order now and pay via PayPal, installment payments are supported. You can also get a 12% discount code: paypal12